Judicial managementLeave to sueQuantification of damagesExecutionLabour court
Tags
Judicial managementLeave to sueLabour claims
legislation
Statutes Cited
Criminal Justice Act 2003
European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR)
Human Rights Act 1998
Prison Rules 1999 (SI 1999/728)
Crime (Sentences) Act 1997
Criminal Justice and Court Services Act 2000
Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012
Criminal Appeal Act 1968
Criminal Appeal Act 1995
Offender Rehabilitation Act 2014
Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008
Coroners and Justice Act 2009
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether leave should be granted to sue a company under judicial management","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Company under judicial management; applicant seeking to quantify damages"}
{"issue_text":"Which respondent is liable for the applicant's labour claims","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"First respondent was employer; share sale agreement between respondents"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant was unfairly dismissed by the first respondent in December 2013. After arbitration awarded reinstatement or damages, the first respondent failed to comply. The company was placed under judicial management, and the applicant sought leave to sue for quantification of damages and execution against the company's property.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases