Amod Mandivenga Takawira v Minister of Lands Agriculture Fisheries, Water & Rural Development N.O and Registrar of Deeds N.O (2022) — Harare High Court | Zalari | Zalari
Compulsory land acquisitionCertificate of no present interestSection 16B Constitutional AmendmentDeed of transfer99-year lease
Tags
Land acquisitionConstitutional validityProperty rights
legislation
Statutes Cited
C
o
n
t
e
m
p
t
o
f
C
o
u
r
t
A
c
t
1
9
8
1
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
,
A
r
t
i
c
l
e
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
P
r
o
c
e
d
u
r
e
a
n
d
I
n
v
e
s
t
i
g
a
t
i
o
n
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
6
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the compulsory acquisition was invalid because it named the previous owner and not the current registered owner","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant held deed 10480/2001; notice referred to deed 7477/73 and Van Niekerk"}
{"issue_text":"Whether failure to endorse the acquisition on the deed invalidates the acquisition","issue_type":"law","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No endorsement on deed 10480/2001"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant purchased a farm from Van Niekerk in 2001 after obtaining certificates of no present interest and compliance. Six months later, the property was gazetted for compulsory acquisition under General Notice 198A of 2002. In 2022, the State granted applicant a 99-year lease over the same property, prompting him to seek a declaration that the original acquisition was invalid as it named the previous owner and was never endorsed on his deed.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases