reinstatement of appealstruck offnon-compliancecondonation
legislation
Statutes Cited
C
r
i
m
i
n
a
l
J
u
s
t
i
c
e
A
c
t
1
9
9
1
C
r
i
m
e
(
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
)
A
c
t
1
9
9
7
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
A
c
t
1
9
9
8
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
,
a
r
t
5
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
,
a
r
t
3
E
u
r
o
p
e
a
n
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
o
n
H
u
m
a
n
R
i
g
h
t
s
,
a
r
t
6
P
r
i
s
o
n
A
c
t
1
9
5
2
P
r
i
s
o
n
R
u
l
e
s
1
9
9
9
(
S
I
1
9
9
9
/
7
2
8
)
L
i
f
e
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
(
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
S
e
n
t
e
n
c
e
s
)
O
r
d
e
r
2
0
0
3
(
S
I
2
0
0
3
/
1
6
5
3
)
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether an application for reinstatement is the proper procedure for an appeal struck off for non-compliance where the applicant is out of time","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Appeal struck off for non-compliance; applicant out of time"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The employee filed an application for reinstatement of her appeal which had been struck off for non-compliance with the rules. The employer objected, arguing she should have sought condonation for late filing instead.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases