Hague Conventionhabitual residencesurrogacy agreementcondonationextension of time
Tags
child abductionHague Conventionsurrogacycustody
legislation
Statutes Cited
Child Abduction Act
Supreme Court Rules, 2018
Supreme Court Rules, 2018
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether applicant should be granted condonation for late noting of appeal and extension of time","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Defective appeal struck off 1 April 2021; application filed 8 days later"}
{"issue_text":"Whether applicant has reasonable prospects of success on appeal concerning Hague Convention applicability","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Surrogacy agreement; respondent’s email; habitual residence finding"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
US-national applicant and Zimbabwean respondent had two children via natural birth and surrogacy in Russia. After relationship breakdown, respondent remained in Zimbabwe with the surrogate-born girl while applicant took the boy to the USA. Applicant sought the girl’s return under the Hague Convention; the High Court dismissed the application, finding Russia was not the child’s habitual residence and the Convention inapplicable. Applicant’s first appeal was struck off for defective notice; he now seeks condonation and extension of time to file a fresh appeal.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases