AllowancesPrescriptionContinuous unfair labour practiceLegitimate expectation
legislation
Statutes Cited
Criminal Justice Act 2003
Juries Act 1974
Contempt of Court Act 1981
Human Rights Act 1998
European Convention on Human Rights, Article 6
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the claim for allowances had prescribed under section 94 of the Labour Act","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Allowances stopped January 2014, claim raised December 2018"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the 2nd respondent is entitled to locomotion, plain clothes and fuel allowances","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Authorization given, never withdrawn, continuous duties performed"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The 2nd respondent, employed as a loss control officer by City of Harare, was authorized to use his personal vehicle for council duties and receive fuel, locomotion and plain clothes allowances. These allowances were unilaterally stopped in January 2014 without notice or withdrawal of authority. The 2nd respondent claimed these allowances in December 2018.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases