Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Agricultural Bank of Zimbabwe Limited t/a Agribank v Elisha Hunda and Beauty Makoni

HH 779-17

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
22 November 2017
Citation
HH 779-17
Neutral Citation
[2017] ZWHH 779
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Trial

Bench

Presiding
Muremba J
Full Bench
Muremba J
Areas of Law
Banking LawContract Law
Keywords
suretyco-principal debtorduressloan facilityimmovable property
Tags
suretyshipduressloan agreementbanking
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • None (no statute or statutory provision is quoted or interpreted)
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether the second defendant is liable to pay the debt as surety and co-principal debtor despite claiming she signed under duress","issue_type":"mixed","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Second defendant signed suretyship in 2011, claimed duress but took no action to set aside until 2017"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The plaintiff bank sued the second defendant for payment of a loan advanced to the first defendant, based on a suretyship signed by the second defendant as surety and co-principal debtor. The second defendant admitted signing but claimed she did so under duress from her late husband.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →