Arbitral award registrationArticle 35(2) compliancePublic policy objectionNatural justice
Tags
ArbitrationCommercial LawEnforcement
legislation
Statutes Cited
Arbitration Act
Arbitration Act
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether application complies with Article 35(2) requirement to attach authenticated original award or certified copy","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant attached unsigned copy of award"}
{"issue_text":"Whether failure to attach arbitral record bars registration","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"No legal requirement to attach full record"}
{"issue_text":"Whether enforcement would violate public policy of Zimbabwe under Article 36(1)(b)(ii)","issue_type":"constitutional","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Alleged procedural irregularities and unpleaded cause of action"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
This is an opposed chamber application for registration of an arbitral award dated 14 June 2023. The respondents filed a separate application to set aside the same award, and the cases were consolidated for hearing.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases