Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

ACCA ZIMBABWE v Cuthbert Munhupedzi

HH 232-21

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
12 May 2021
Citation
HH 232-21
Neutral Citation
[2021] ZWHH 232
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
Charewa J
Full Bench
Charewa J
Areas of Law
Property LawEmployment LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
rei vindicatiovehicle ownershipemployment contractprescriptionvindication
Tags
rei vindicatioemployment benefitscompany vehiclesprescription
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 3
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 8
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • ,
  • a
  • r
  • t
  • 5
  • E
  • u
  • r
  • o
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • C
  • o
  • n
  • v
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • n
  • H
  • u
  • m
  • a
  • n
  • R
  • i
  • g
  • h
  • t
  • s
  • ,
  • a
  • r
  • t
  • 3
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • e
  • (
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • e
  • s
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 7
  • P
  • o
  • w
  • e
  • r
  • s
  • o
  • f
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • s
  • (
  • S
  • e
  • n
  • t
  • e
  • n
  • c
  • i
  • n
  • g
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 2
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • M
  • u
  • r
  • d
  • e
  • r
  • (
  • A
  • b
  • o
  • l
  • i
  • t
  • i
  • o
  • n
  • o
  • f
  • D
  • e
  • a
  • t
  • h
  • P
  • e
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • t
  • y
  • )
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6
  • 5
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6
  • 7
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 1
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • J
  • u
  • s
  • t
  • i
  • c
  • e
  • a
  • n
  • d
  • P
  • u
  • b
  • l
  • i
  • c
  • O
  • r
  • d
  • e
  • r
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 4
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • p
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 6
  • 8
  • C
  • r
  • i
  • m
  • i
  • n
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • p
  • p
  • e
  • a
  • l
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 9
  • 5
  • S
  • u
  • p
  • r
  • e
  • m
  • e
  • C
  • o
  • u
  • r
  • t
  • A
  • c
  • t
  • 1
  • 9
  • 8
  • 1
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Has applicant's right to vindication prescribed?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Cause of action arose 2016-04-07, application filed 2020-07-09"}
  • {"issue_text":"Was there any contract entitling respondent to ownership after five years?","issue_type":"factual","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"No written provision, alleged verbal amendment"}
  • {"issue_text":"Are there material disputes of fact requiring trial?","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Alleged verbal agreement, respondent's inconsistent positions"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant (ACCA Zimbabwe) sought vindication of two company vehicles from the respondent, a former employee who was dismissed in April 2016 but retained possession of the vehicles. The respondent claimed ownership based on an alleged verbal amendment to his employment contract entitling him to ownership after five years.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →