Back to top
Zalari has raised $2 million USD in a founding round led by Nyamaropa Technologies
Harare High Court

Abiather Mujeyi v Afrasia Bank Zimbabwe & 3 Ors

HH 596-18

Case Details

Court
Harare High Court
Date
3 October 2018
Citation
HH 596-18
Neutral Citation
[2018] ZWHH 596
Outcome
unknown
Case Type
Application

Bench

Presiding
MAKONI J
Full Bench
MAKONI J
Areas of Law
Property LawCivil Procedure
Keywords
Sale in executionOrder 40 rule 359Property attachmentSheriff confirmation
Tags
Sale in executionProperty valuationSheriff's procedures
legislation
Statutes Cited
  • High Court Rules, Order 40
ai analysis
Case Summary

Key Issues

  • {"issue_text":"Whether applicant can approach court directly under rule 359(8) without first requesting Sheriff to set aside sale","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Applicant did not request Sheriff to set aside sale; no decision made by Sheriff"}
  • {"issue_text":"Whether failure to give applicant notice to object invalidates the sale","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"no","related_facts":"Applicant claims he was not copied with objection letter"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case

Background

The applicant sought to set aside a sale in execution of his property by the Sheriff, arguing the sale price of US$39,000 was grossly low. The property had been attached following a judgment debt of US$396,782.63. The applicant claimed he was not given opportunity to object to the sale as required by rule 359.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases
Open in Zalari →