Direct AccessRipenessConstitutional AvoidanceUnregistered Customary UnionsMatrimonial Causes Act
Tags
Constitutional LawDirect AccessRipenessDoctrine of AvoidanceMarriage Law
legislation
Statutes Cited
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Constitution of Zimbabwe Amendment (No. 20) Act 2013
Matrimonial Causes Act [Chapter 5:13]
Customary Marriages Act [Chapter 5:07]
ai analysis
Case Summary
Key Issues
{"issue_text":"Whether the application for direct access should be granted where the subject matter is still under consideration by Parliament","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The existence of the Marriages Bill before Parliament"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the matter is ripe for adjudication by the Constitutional Court","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The Bill's status in the legislative process"}
{"issue_text":"Whether it is in the interests of justice to grant direct access","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"The availability of alternative legislative remedies"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
The applicant, Zimbabwe Women Lawyers Association, sought direct access to the Constitutional Court to challenge the constitutionality of the definition of marriage in section 2 of the Matrimonial Causes Act, which excludes unregistered customary unions. The court dismissed the application as not ripe for adjudication because a Marriages Bill addressing this issue was currently before Parliament.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases