{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator erred in determining the matter without oral evidence being led","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Both parties opted to rely on written submissions"}
{"issue_text":"Whether the arbitrator misdirected himself in upholding the dismissals based on written submissions alone","issue_type":"procedural","dispositive":"yes","related_facts":"Written submissions constituted evidence before arbitrator"}
This summary was generated by AI. Use Zalari to read the full judgment.
background
Facts of the Case
Background
Twenty employees appealed against an arbitral award that upheld their dismissal for engaging in unlawful collective job action. The arbitrator had differentiated penalties based on degree of participation, imposing dismissal for those involved in wilful disobedience and assault, and final written warnings for mere participation.
Read the full judgment, get AI analysis, and find related cases